At Risk Youth And Afterschool Programs Recreation Programing

At-Risk Youth and Afterschool Programs Recreation Programing In the United States and developed countries around the world, it is generally accepted that schools play a tremendous role in the lives of children, youth, and families in urban, rural, and suburban communities with populations of widely varying socioeconomic resources. However; in some communities there seems to be a clear need to provide more program support for organizations, and to provide programs and services for hours outside the parameters of the school day. In these communities, â€Å"at-risk† child and youth populations and their families require more from the agencies and organizations that strive to serve the needs of the public in education, health, and†¦show more content†¦According to Howard K. David, and Lorraine C. Peniston, writers for the American Institutes for Research Pelavin Research Center, and Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice acknowledges, â€Å"The term â€Å"at- risk,† in a broad sense, refers to youth who, due to certain characteristics or experiences, are statistically more likely than other youth to encounter certain problems – legal, social, financial, educational, emotional, and health – in the future† (qtd. At–Risk and Delinquent Youth: Multiple Federal Programs Raise Efficiency Report, March 1996, 1). According to the Development Services Group (DSG), â€Å"Research findings estimate that 35 percent of 12 year-olds is regularly left by themselves while their parents are at work† (1). DSG concludes, â€Å"Justifying the need for more programs to address this supervision gap is the apparent peak of violent crime in the 4 hours following the end of the school day (roughly 2–6 p.m.)† (4). Statistics, data, and anecdotal research provided on this topic reveal a relevant opportunity to address today’s need for structured prevention programming for children and youth through park s and recreation programs. As we continue to see problems with these at-risk child and youth populations in communities across our country, we can see other social, economic, healthcare, private sector and government professionals pinpointing, researching, and

David Thoreau Civil Disobedience Free Essays

Ricardo Henry David Thoreau Civil Disobedience Throughout history the government’s gained too much power are likely to be corrupt. It is up to citizens to go against government and get rid of any negativity. In order to change the government citizens should vote for an individual who can change the country in a positive way. We will write a custom essay sample on David Thoreau Civil Disobedience or any similar topic only for you Order Now Henry David Thoreau was a philosopher, observer, and writer best known for his attacks on American social institutions and his respect for nature and simple living. He believed in civil disobedience in order to disagree with government rules. Henry David Thoreau was not like the average American because he was not materialistic which is shown in his  free thought, importance of nature, and self-reliance toward the government. Thoreau kept a journal as a source for his published writings and lectures. He was a very motivated writer and habituary classics such as Greek, Latin and English texts. He also read sacred writing of the Hindus that was a big influence on cosmic vision in Walden. Thoreau starts to question authority in Walden. Thoreau spent his night in local jail in a protest against the proslavery agenda of the war against Mexico; he refused to pay his poll tax. The experience would inspire resistance to civil government, at a later time this could be a major debate on relationship of the individual to the state† (Thoreau 827). He believed in nonviolence ideals and was thrown in jail for being against the law and not paying taxes. For example, Mahatma Gandhi led Indians to protest against the salt tax in o rder to achieve independence against the British. Thoreau’s views on civil disobedience influenced the civil rights movement in the 1960s. Civil disobedience was an act of willful resistance and it is the duty of all American citizens. Martin Luther King uses Thoreau’s strategy in order to not obey the law as he wanted to end racial inequality in America. He criticizes American social institution and policies such as slavery. In order to resolve conflicts Thoreau insisted that all principled action had to be undertaken by the individual rather than through groups. When the government is unjust people should refuse to follow the law and stay away from it at all cost. American government is unjust for the practice of aggressive war and supporting slavery. Thoreau explains the differences between social classes in American society. Henry Thoreau likens Americans to horses and dogs. They are commonly esteemed good citizens. However, legislator, lawyers, ministers do not make moral distinction and serve the devil, and do not rely on God. Thoreau suggested to readers â€Å"A wise man will only be useful as a man and will not submit to be clay but leave that office to his dust. He who gives himself to his fellow men appears as useless and selfish. He who gives himself partially to them is a philanthropist† (Thoreau 831). At that time government was devious and they started trading slaves. This shows that an honest man needs to rebel against government and stand up for themselves. As evidence Thoreau mentions that he did not pay any poll-tax for six years. He was thrown to jail for one night. The state will force him to obey the law, punish is body, and to think like them. Thoreau defends his lifestyle and mentions that he is a sojourner in civilized life. He tells the reader that he does charity to help poor students in school. When release from prison he starts to pay his taxes to support students who are going to school. Old people do not have any important advice to tell young generations. They faced many failures in their lives. Throughout the years dressing in this country was a dignity of art. Sailors make shift to wear clothing and every generation laughs at old fashions and tries on the new one. The factory system is best way for men to get clothing. The industry grows as more people buy clothes. According to Food, Shelter, Clothing, and Fuel are the basic survival tool for people. Thoreau wanted to build his own house by Walden Ponds — He went for days cutting and hewing timber to design the size of the house. By April the house was framed and all set up and bought shanty of James Collins. Collins was an Irishman who worked on Fitchburg Railroad for boards. He had a roof, good window, and walls in the house. Thoreau paid him 4 dollars and 25 cents for Collins to take possession of the house and to not sell it to anyone else. Seeley was another Irishman who represents spectatordom and help with the removal of the Gods of Troy. If a student wishes to shelter he can rent annually to have a place in his house. Thoreau started planting eleven acres of potatoes, corn, peas, and turnips in order to pay unusual expenses while building his house. He made more money than any farmer in Concord at that time. He realized that it would be problem to obtain food such as animal as a source of health and strength. People should life free and uncommitted in order to appreciate your farm. Thoreau’s explained citizen to work on your farm until death and not to do farming and quit at some point. If men would steadily observe realities only and not allow themselves to be deluded life to compare it with such things. People should respect music and poetry. Men establish and confirm daily life of routine and habit everywhere which is built in illusionary foundations† (Thoreau 895). He is basically saying that people should start to be nicer to others, appreciate poetry, and to stay from things that are useless for th e future. Henry David Thoreau was not like the average American because he was not materialistic which is shown in his  free thought, importance of nature, and self-reliance toward the government. Since he kept a journal as a source for his published writings and lectures. Thoreau’s views on civil disobedience influence the civil rights movement in the 1960s. He also explains the differences between social classes in American society. He defends his lifestyle and mentions that he is a sojourner in civilized life. Last, he explains food, shelter, clothing, and fuel are the basic survival tool for people. If people work, and put their mind together they can achieve a balance society where people can be happy. How to cite David Thoreau Civil Disobedience, Papers

Open-Editorial for Autonomy and Respect - myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theOpen-Editorial for Autonomy and Respect. Answer: Clashes between the different principles of nursing have been reported by many healthcare professionals over years. The clash between maintaining of the human dignity and the maintenance of the nursing duties based on principles of beneficence and non maleficence is observed. With the gradual passing of years, the rights of human dignity has been identified as the sense of self worth and self respect possessed by an individual of the nation. Human dignity mainly encompasses the right to fill basic needs like food, shelter and personal safety. In respect to nursing profession, human dignity mainly reflects the aspects of privacy, autonomy and respect of the patients (Jacobs, 2016). Each and every individuals of the nursing profession have to abide by the principal of dignity of the patients where they have to ask for their consent, wait for their approval and make them know about the entire procedure and consequences of the treatment they apply to patients. On the other hand, each and every nurse has to abide by the two principles of beneficence and non maleficence for the betterment of the patients (Cheraghi, Manookian and Nasrabadi, 2014). By the principle of beneficence, nurses need to provide the safest care to patient, which brings the best outcomes on patient health ensuring patient safety and patient satisfaction. By the principle of non-maleficence, the nurse needs to cause no harm to patients. Therefore nurses should provide the best care plan which would not only help patients to get proper service, but also help them to get well and develop their life for betterment (Rehssfeldt et al., 2014). This is for helping the society to strive well and lead happy lives so that the nation gradually gets free from people sufferings for the common good. There has been always a matter of concern when a nurse has to face a dilemma when adhering to more than one principle at a time. There are cases where the patients themselves lose the hope to live or does not want to live anymore may be due to chronic physical suffering or due to severe mental disorders. Often many suffer from severe depression. Such patients request nurses not to help them to survive and this becomes a moral concern for the nurses as their duty is to save peoples lives. (Eskilsson et al., 2015). Nurses who are responsible to save lives of people are in turn requested not to provide any care treatment for them. Here nurses often suffers from dilemma that whether they should save the human dignity or they should maintain their duty of beneficence and non maleficence. The concern of the do not resuscitate is often argued in the medical fields and result in popular debates. While many experts feel that giving freedom to such people who do not want to live is in a way serving them for making them not suffer from the physical or mental pain. Moreover, they also are of the opinion that helping in the end of sufferings of people are in turn helping them to get free of sufferings. This is unaccepted for another set of experts who believe every life is a blessing and putting an end to it when there is a scope of better chance of making the patient service is unethical. These experts suggest that often sufferings make people weak where they no more want to live. However, saving such lives and helping them to make their lives better with evidence based interventions are much more preferable (Santorum, 2014). This argument can be thereby explained as a conflict between benefits of common good and respecting the human dignity. Although every nurse should use both the principles in their care plan but often they face issues with such incidents. These issues are of the main concerns where new nurses face difficulty to take decisions in such situations of ethical dilemma as they get nervous (Girard et al., 2017). However with the gradual handling of such incidents, nurses develop situational awareness where they can take decisions about how to proceed with the cases. Critical reasoning skills are one of the most important skills which help nurses to handle such situations bravely. Moreover the strict laws of protecting human rights which have been introduced by the nations to make the nurses abide by the ethical principles make the situations worse as often nurse get involved in legal complication due to this. Hence serving human dignity and benefits for common good often becomes a concern fo r nurses. References: Cheraghi, M.A., Manookian, A. Nasrabadi, A.N., (2014). Human dignity in religion-embedded cross-cultural nursing.Nursing ethics,21(8), pp.916-928. Eskilsson, C., Carlsson, G., Ekebergh, M. Hrberg, U., (2015). The experiences of patients receiving care from nursing students at a Dedicated Education Unit: A phenomenological study.Nurse education in practice,15(5), pp.353-358. Girard, A., Hudon, C., Poitras, M.E., Roberge, P. Chouinard, M.C., (2017). Primary care nursing activities with patients affected by physical chronic disease and common mental disorders: a qualitative descriptive study.Journal of clinical nursing,26(9-10), pp.1385-1394. Jacobs, B.B., (2016). Respect for human dignity in nursing: Philosophical and practical perspectives.Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive,32(2). Rehnsfeldt, A., Lindwall, L., Lohne, V., Lillest, B., Sletteb, ., Heggestad, A.K.T., Aasgaard, T., Rholm, M.B., Caspari, S., Hy, B. Steren, B., (2014). The meaning of dignity in nursing home care as seen by relatives.Nursing ethics,21(5), pp.507-517. Santorum, R., (2014).It takes a family: Conservatism and the common good. Open Road Media.